Was 9/11 An Inside Job?

I do not contend that 9/11 was an "inside job." The government rarely does any "job" in and of itself.

As for the investigation of 9/11, defense contractors were put up to the job, such as ARA and SAIC, who happen to also develop directed energy weapons and conduct psychological operations.I cannot claim whether the "job" was "inside" or "outside" because we do not have enough evidence to say who did this, but we can say what was done and who covered it up -- particularly, government contractors.
Truthfully, government is an abstract concept. It does not exist but as a figment of our imaginations. There is a hierarchy of corporate alliances that conduct psychological operations in order to maintain war and endless debt-driven financing of state functions, and we often refer to this alliance as the "government," while it is making decisions independent of Congress, the President and the Supreme Court.

Government is derived from two Latin words, "gubernare mentis," meaning to "control the mind" or "mind control," and it literally exists in the mind. The functional definition of this abstract is any entity which uses monopolization of market influences to advance military objectives, being funded by means of theft (taxation).
No governmental body, nor any other 9/11 researcher, has produced a forensic study into the destruction of any of the seven WTC buildings in New York.Page 43 of the RFC filed by Dr. Wood asserts that the basic integrity of NCSTAR 1 is lacking because, by its own admission, it did not investigate the actual destruction of the World Trade Center Towers. That is, NIST did not accomplish its stated goal of determining "why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed following the initial impacts of the aircraft and why and how WTC 7 collapsed."



NCSTAR 1 states:

The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instance of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. For brevity in this report, this sequence is referred to as the 'probable collapse sequence,' although it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable.

_____

World Trade Center Disaster Study (NIST): http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/

Dr. Judy Wood has produced the only forensic study on the destructive mechanism of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, contained in the book, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? EVIDENCE OF DIRECTED FREE-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ON 9/11, and she has filed her evidence with the federal courts in her RFC to NIST (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html).

Dr. Wood's Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST (March 16, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html
Dr. Wood's Appeal to the NIST's Response (August 22, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
Subsequent Qui Tam case (October 20, 2009): http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml
Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3, Sttorney Jerry V. Leaphart (July 11, 2008): www.drjudywood.com/pdf/080711_Wood_07CV3314_103.pdf

[VIDEO] Attorney Jerry Leaphart on the NIST Data Quality Act: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2-u6eHAJ1w