Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Was 9/11 An Inside Job?


I do not contend that 9/11 was an "inside job." The government rarely does any "job" in and of itself.

As for the investigation of 9/11, defense contractors were put up to the job, such as ARA and SAIC, who happen to also develop directed energy weapons and conduct psychological operations.
I cannot claim whether the "job" was "inside" or "outside" because we do not have enough evidence to say who did this, but we can say what was done and who covered it up -- particularly, government contractors.
Truthfully, government is an abstract concept. It does not exist but as a figment of our imaginations. There is a hierarchy of corporate alliances that conduct psychological operations in order to maintain war and endless debt-driven financing of state functions, and we often refer to this alliance as the "government," while it is making decisions independent of Congress, the President and the Supreme Court.

Government is derived from two Latin words, "gubernare mentis," meaning to "control the mind" or "mind control," and it literally exists in the mind. The functional definition of this abstract is any entity which uses monopolization of market influences to advance military objectives, being funded by means of theft (taxation).

No governmental body, nor any other 9/11 researcher, has produced a forensic study into the destruction of any of the seven WTC buildings in New York.
Page 43 of the RFC filed by Dr. Wood asserts that the basic integrity of NCSTAR 1 is lacking because, by its own admission, it did not investigate the actual destruction of the World Trade Center Towers. That is, NIST did not accomplish its stated goal of determining "why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed following the initial impacts of the aircraft and why and how WTC 7 collapsed."



NCSTAR 1 states:

The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instance of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. For brevity in this report, this sequence is referred to as the 'probable collapse sequence,' although it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable.

_____

World Trade Center Disaster Study (NIST): http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/

Dr. Judy Wood has produced the only forensic study on the destructive mechanism of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, contained in the book, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? EVIDENCE OF DIRECTED FREE-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ON 9/11, and she has filed her evidence with the federal courts in her RFC to NIST (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html).


Dr. Wood's Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST (March 16, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html
Dr. Wood's Appeal to the NIST's Response (August 22, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
Subsequent Qui Tam case (October 20, 2009): http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml
Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3, Sttorney Jerry V. Leaphart (July 11, 2008): www.drjudywood.com/pdf/080711_Wood_07CV3314_103.pdf

[VIDEO] Attorney Jerry Leaphart on the NIST Data Quality Act:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2-u6eHAJ1w

Friday, September 11, 2015

Dr. Judy Wood: A Qualified Scientist Who Completed A Forensic Study Into The Destructrion of Seven WTC Buildings


Read the only existing forensic study into the destruction of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11 by Dr. Judy Wood, entitled Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11 (http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy)

Dr. Wood's Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST (March 16, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html

Dr. Wood's Appeal to the NIST's Response (August 22, 2007): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

Subsequent Qui Tam case (October 20, 2009): http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml

Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3, Sttorney Jerry V. Leaphart (July 11, 2008): http://www.drjudywood.com/pdf/080711_Wood_07CV3314_103.pdf

____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ 
Dr. Judy Wood received her

  • B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
  • M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
  • Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. She has taught courses including
  • Experimental Stress Analysis,
  • Engineering Mechanics,
  • Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials)
  • Strength of Materials Testing
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/a/bio/Wood_Bio.html

Peer-review papers from Dr. Judy Wood (available online):


Deformation Measurements of Composite Multi-Span Beam Shear Specimens by Moire Interferometry: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA304605
Detection of Delamination Onset in a Composite Laminate Using Moiré Interferometry: http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/JOURNALS/COMPTECH/PAGES/CTR10308J.htm

Deformations and strains in a thick adherend lap joint: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19890022713

Determination of thermal strains by moiré interferometry: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02321415

Micromechanical Study of Thermal Strains near the Interface of a Bimaterial Joint by Microscopic Moiré Interferometry: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992exme.conf.1692W

Thermal Stresses in a Bimaterial Joint: An Experimental Analysis: http://appliedmechanics.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=1411212

Influence of Matrix Chemistry on the Short Term, Hydrothermal Aging of Vinyl Ester Matrix and Composites under Both Isothermal and Thermal Spiking Conditions : http://jcm.sagepub.com/content/33/20/1918.short

Determination of thermal strains in the neighborhood of a bimaterial interface: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06072006-124140/ (Only available to Virginia Tech staff)


Response to All Disinfo-Trolls Who Claim Superiority to Dr. Judy Wood and Her Research: Let's See Your Federal Case and Investigation!

DR. JUDY WOOD IS THE ONLY 9/11 RESEARCHER WHO HAS SUBMITTED EVIDENCE TO THE COURTS ABOUT THE DESTRUCTIVE MECHANISM OF SEVEN WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDINGS IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH.



Read Dr. Wood's Request For Corrections (RFC) to NIST: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html

& the Appeal: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

You may also want to review the subsequent Qui Tam case: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Initial_Qui_Tam_Wood.html#complaint

& Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3 July 11, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart: http://www.drjudywood.com/pdf/080711_Wood_07CV3314_103.pdf

DR. JUDY WOOD on behalf of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff/Relator,
vs.
Defendants.
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (ARA), SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP.(SAIC), UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC., WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC. (WJE), ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.(RJA), COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER, INC. (SGH), SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL, LLP (SOM), GILSANZ MURRAY STEFICEK LLP (GMS), UGHES ASSOCIATES, INC. (HA), ROSENWASSER/GROSSMAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C., S. K. GHOSH ASSOCIATES, INC. (GA), TENG & ASSOCIATES, INC. (TA), AJMAL ABBASI, EDUARDO KAUSEL, DAVID PARKS, DAVID SHARP, JOSEF VAN DYCK, KASPAR WILLIAM, DANIELE VENEZANO, DATASOURCE, INC., GEOSTAATS, INC., NuSTATS,



...MOST IMPORTANTLY, READ THE BOOK!


For a forensic study of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, read the book "Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" by Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science and expertise in experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of materials testing. http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

More than just pictures and video clips:


SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 1 (110-stories, 500,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- without p-wave or s-wave

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 2 (110-stories, 500,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.1 -- without p-wave or s-wave

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 7 (47-stories, 230,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 0.6 -- without p-wave or s-wave


www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/WTC_LDEO_KIM.pdf
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/fact_sheet.htm

*For comparison: Seismic Impact for Seattle Kingdome Collapse (130,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- with p-wave and s-wave


16 Survivors at Stairwell B:
http://www.thrnewmedia.com/adayinseptember/jonas.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2035963/9-11-Anniversary-Miraculous-escape-16-trapped-North-Towers-Stairwell-B.html

Tritium at WTC: https://www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/240430.pdf

Magnetometer data: http://magnet.gi.alaska.edu/table_index/2001_table.html





Top 3 Disinfo-Troll Tactics:


#1: When in doubt, call people names.

#2: When someone talks about evidence, refer to it as a theory and talk about something else, anything else but the evidence.

#3: When confronted with unwanted information, claim that you have already debunked it, but never claim that you actually read the source material because then you could be held liable for what you say about it (i.e. your opponent might ask you to cite specific wording on a specific page).

Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Materials Contained in the World Trade Center Complex & Seismic Evidence


The World Trade Center complex contained 200,000 tons of steel. In addition, there were 425,000 cubic yards of concrete, which extrapolates to 1,721,250,000 tons in USCS units, contained in the World Trade Center complex.

Certainly, this is not comparable with the seismic data observed of 2.3 (WTC 1), 2.1 (WTC 2) and 0.6 (WTC 7), none of which showed primary nor secondary waves recorded, meaning there was no discernable impact travelling through the earth when seven World Trade Center buildings were destroyed on 9/11/01 (WTC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7).

SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 1 (110-stories, 500,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- without p-wave or s-wave
SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 2 (110-stories, 500,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.1 -- without p-wave or s-wave
SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 7 (47-stories, 230,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 0.6 -- without p-wave or s-wave

www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/WTC_LDEO_KIM.pdf
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/fact_sheet.htm

*For comparison: Seismic Impact for Seattle Kingdome Collapse (130,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- with p-wave and s-wave

For further information, visit the following websites:
http://drjudywood.com




Read the only existing forensic study of the destruction of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11 by Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science and expertise in experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of materials testing.
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com



The World Trade Center complex contained:
- 200,000 tons of steel
- 425,000 cubic yards of concrete
- 43,600 windows
- 12,000 miles of electric cables

(The WTC complex had its own zip code: 10048)

World Trade Center 1 & 2, each were:
- 110 floors
- 208 ft by 208 ft at base
- 500,000 tons in weight

WTC 1: 1,368 ft high (north tower)
WTC 2: 1,362 ft high (south tower)

[Sources:]

WTC statistics:
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/wtc1.html
https://www.nysm.nysed.gov/wtc/about/facts.html

Concrete information:
http://www.cemexusa.com/ProductsServices/ReadyMixConcreteFaq.aspx