Certainly, this is not comparable with the seismic data observed of 2.3 (WTC 1), 2.1 (WTC 2) and 0.6 (WTC 7), none of which showed primary nor secondary waves recorded, meaning there was no discernable impact travelling through the earth when seven World Trade Center buildings were destroyed on 9/11/01 (WTC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7).
SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 1 (110-stories, 500,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- without p-wave or s-wave
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- without p-wave or s-wave
SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 2 (110-stories, 500,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.1 -- without p-wave or s-wave
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.1 -- without p-wave or s-wave
SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 7 (47-stories, 230,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 0.6 -- without p-wave or s-wave
Local Magnitude (ML) 0.6 -- without p-wave or s-wave
www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/WTC_LDEO_KIM.pdf
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/fact_sheet.htm
*For comparison: Seismic Impact for Seattle Kingdome Collapse (130,000 tons):
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- with p-wave and s-wave
Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- with p-wave and s-wave
For further information, visit the following websites:
http://drjudywood.com
Read the only existing forensic study of the destruction of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11 by Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science and expertise in experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of materials testing.
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com
The World Trade Center complex contained:
- 200,000 tons of steel
- 425,000 cubic yards of concrete
- 43,600 windows
- 12,000 miles of electric cables
(The WTC complex had its own zip code: 10048)
World Trade Center 1 & 2, each were:
- 110 floors
- 208 ft by 208 ft at base
- 500,000 tons in weight
WTC 1: 1,368 ft high (north tower)
WTC 2: 1,362 ft high (south tower)
[Sources:]
WTC statistics:
http://www.infoplease.com/
https://
Concrete information:
http://www.cemexusa.com/
Dr. Judy Wood has produced the only forensic study on the destructive mechanism of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, contained in the book, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? EVIDENCE OF DIRECTED FREE-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ON 9/11, and she has filed her evidence with the federal courts in her RFC to NIST (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html).
ReplyDeleteNo governmental body, nor any other 9/11 researcher, has produced a forensic study into the destruction of any of the seven WTC buildings in New York.
Attorney Jerry Leaphart on the NIST Data Quality Act: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2-u6eHAJ1w
Page 43 of the RFC filed by Dr. Wood asserts that the basic integrity of NCSTAR 1 is lacking because, by its own admission, it did not investigate the actual destruction of the World Trade Center Towers. That is, NIST did not accomplish its stated goal of determining "why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed following the initial impacts of the aircraft and why and how WTC 7 collapsed."
Dr. Wood's RFC to NIST (All pages): http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html
"The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instance of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. For brevity in this report, this sequence is referred to as the 'probable collapse sequence,' although it does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable." ~NCSTAR 1 (http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/)
Read Dr. Wood's Request For Corrections (RFC) to NIST: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html
& the Appeal: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
You may also want to review the subsequent Qui Tam case: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Initial_Qui_Tam_Wood.html#complaint
& Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration per F.R. Civ. P59(e) and Local Rule 6.3 July 11, 2008, Jerry V. Leaphart: http://www.drjudywood.com/pdf/080711_Wood_07CV3314_103.pdf
DR. JUDY WOOD on behalf of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff/Relator,
vs.
Defendants.
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (ARA), SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP.(SAIC), UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC., ET AL.
...MOST IMPORTANTLY, READ THE BOOK!
For a forensic study of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, read the book "Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" by Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science and expertise in experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of materials testing. http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/
More than just pictures and video clips:
SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 1 (110-stories, 500,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- without p-wave or s-wave
SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 2 (110-stories, 500,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.1 -- without p-wave or s-wave
SEISMIC IMPACT FOR WTC 7 (47-stories, 230,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 0.6 -- without p-wave or s-wave
www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/WTC_LDEO_KIM.pdf http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/Eq/20010911_WTC/fact_sheet.htm
*For comparison: Seismic Impact for Seattle Kingdome Collapse (130,000 tons): Local Magnitude (ML) 2.3 -- with p-wave and s-wave
16 Survivors at Stairwell B: http://www.thrnewmedia.com/adayinseptember/jonas.htm http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2035963/9-11-Anniversary-Miraculous-escape-16-trapped-North-Towers-Stairwell-B.html
Tritium at WTC: https://www.llnl.gov/tid/lof/documents/pdf/240430.pdf
Magnetometer data: http://magnet.gi.alaska.edu/table_index/2001_table.html
Billard Ball Example (BBE):http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html#c1 http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html#c4