Dr. Eugene Mallove Uncovered Fraud By MIT: Massachusetts Institue of Technology Committed Fraud, Misrepresenting Evidence of Excess Heat in an Electrolytic Cell

Dr. B. Stanley Pons (left) and Dr. Martin Fleischmann (right)

Eugene Mallove, chief science writer for MIT in 1989, investigated the discovery of low-energy nuclear reactions by University of Utah chemists, Drs. Martin Fleischmann and B. Stanley Pons. He found that the calorimetric data of the Fleischmann-Pons experiments, showed anomalous heat that could not be accounted for in any known chemical reaction.

MIT conducted tests which were aimed at replicating this excess heat effect. After reviewing the calorimetric data of MIT, Mallove revealed fraudulent reports by the university, claiming that there was no excess heat, while the unadjusted results actually reinforced the discovery of excess heat. Mallove uncovered that his university had malevolently altered their results to invalidate Pons and Fleischmann.

Dr. Mallove resigned from MIT to tell the world of this scientific fraud. He published investigative reports on the misdeeds of MIT nuclear physicists, who had a vested interest in the hot fusion research, in the cold fusion scandal. His book, Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion Furor, revealed a cover-up in the science community, stifling a whole new area of scientific research. Since Mallove's death in 2004, Los Alamos has affirmed the truth of low-energy nuclear reactions(LENR). A well-known writer, Arthur C. Clarke concluded that the suppression of cold fusion was "one of the greatest scandals in the history of science."

“I have had fifty years of experience in nuclear physics and I know what’s possible and what’s not... I will not look at any more [cold fusion] evidence! It’s all junk!”
~Herman Feshbach, MIT professor, 1991

“I hope you recognize that the late Professor Feshbach’s most unfortunate and ill-considered reaction was fundamentally unscientific. It reminds me of the Church leaders at the time of Galileo, who refused to look through Galileo’s telescope at the Moon or at Jupiter because they “knew” that nothing new could be seen. Yes, many modern scientists are filled with catastrophic hubris; they have in many ways become mere “technicians of science,” and guardians to what amounts to a pernicious “Holy Writ.” Don’t bother me with the experimental evidence, my theory can tell me what is possible and what is not!”
~Eugene Mallove, www.infinite-energy.com, 2004