In modern literature, the term "tornado" is used in relation to two different physical processes, which have some similarities.
One process is caused by the uprising of air from the heated surface of the Earth. A moderate circulation of air at the periphery transforms into a strong rotation in the middle creating a helical flow directed upward. With this helical flow, the air entrains the dust from the ground. This type of tornado is referred to as a "dust devil."
The other process, born from a "tornadic" cumulonimbus cloud or a large cumulus cloud, is quite different. This united swirling flow, the more dangerous form of a tornado, touches the Earth's surface in the form of a long, narrow funnel. The air inside the funnel rotates with a high speed, which sometimes approaches the speed of sound.
The thunderstorm cloud, which is part of a small tropical hurricane, has a so-called "eye." This cloud has a spiral structure. If the whirlwind cloud has a large size, it will appear to be very similar to a cyclone. Cyclones can often produce tornadoes.
A circular cavity is formed in the center of the funnel by rotating clouds. The pressure inside of a tornado is very low, and when the cavity touches a building with windows tightly shut, the building almost explodes from inside and the walls can can be thrust outward. Tornadoes have such an incredible force that they can throw tractor trailers across large distances. However, they can have quite selective effects and have been seen removing a roof from a house, leaving many objects inside the house intact. They can also expose the bottom of lakes, sucking up the water contained therein.
Source:
Merkulov, Vladimir I. Amazing Hydromechanics. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse, 2012. Print
How to get protected against tornado, Vladimir I. Merkulov:
UPDATE: The page pertaining to the "Projected Scalable Water Jet" reappeared on ARA's website (http://www.ara.com/Projects/p_waterjet.htm), and the web archive's earliest recording of its appearance is December 11, 2009. This means that this page
was not available for over a year between July 5, 2008 and December 11,
2009. ARA also has modified certain information on the page, changing
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to "the customer," and any other
mention of LANL was removed. Could they be attempting to protect their
customer in this case?
Albuquerque, NM (VN) – Meet Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA), a leading international defense contractor that works with governmental and corporate bodies across the world, including the United States government's Department of Defense (DoD). This company serves many purposes for government, including weapons testing, development and manufacturing, as well as psychological operations. ARA has been developing advanced weapons systems since its inception in 1979.
This cryptic organization uses equivocated terms across their website to describe their function as a defense contractor, such as “ technology services” and “ mission-critical solutions”:
ARA is one of the fastest growing technology services companies in the country. We bring together employees with diverse backgrounds and experience to enhance the creativity and innovation of the mission-critical solutions we provide.
Source: http://www.ara.com/Careers/working_at_ara.htm
On March 1, 2007, ARA posted the information below concerning a certain weapon, which has since been removed from its website-- the “Prototype Disruptor,” which was also referred to as the Projected Scalable Water Jet:
ARA claims that they have designed a scalable disruptor, with assistance from representatives of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). They allege that this device has the capacity to “disrupt and defeat” explosives and their associated components. Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science, quoted the above page from ARA on her website on October 9, 2007, while investigating modern weapons technologies and the events of September 11, 2001.
Less than a year after this information appeared on DrJudyWood.com, the above page about the “Prototype Disruptor” was taken down from ARA.com. As seen on the WayBackMachine, web.archive.org, no record of this page can be viewed on ARA's website past July 5, 2008, meaning that the page existed for approximately 16 months. They appear to be concealing this information. The question is, why?
ARA also happens to be the company that was awarded a contract to investigate the destruction of the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001 under funding from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST):
Data from ARA's research was provided to established the initial conditions for the fire dynamics modeling and the thermal-structural response and collapse initiation analysis in subsequent NIST sponsored projects.
Source: http://www.ara.com/Projects/SVO/NIST_WTC.htm
In addition, ARA was a primary Respondent in Dr. Wood's Qui Tam case, following her Request For Corrections to NIST, as well as other notable entities such as Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) and Underwriter's Laboratory, Inc. (UL):
On the web archive, we find a page entitled, “Technology and systems to support and protect our warfighters: Related Capabilities,” which is dated February 2, 2007, and has since been removed:
ARA has since modified pages relating to “Weapon systems” and “Weapon effects,” removing the following images, which show weapons and ballistics testing:
They have also completely removed the page about “Advanced energy systems,” on which made references to “lightweight deployable fuel cell electric power generators.” Could this be a coincidence? Maybe. However, there seems to be a pattern of concealment happening here. It would be wise, if we wish to keep those we call government and its subsidiaries accountable, for us to take notice of defense contractors, and we should to pay especially close attention to the information that they release, as well as that which they conceal.
Dr. Judy Wood has produced the only forensic study on the destructive
mechanism of seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, contained in
the book, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? EVIDENCE OF DIRECTED FREE-ENERGY
TECHNOLOGY ON 9/11, and she has filed her evidence with the federal
courts in her RFC to NIST (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html).
No governmental body, nor any other 9/11 researcher, has produced a forensic study into the destruction of any of the seven WTC buildings in New York.
Attorney Jerry Leaphart on the NIST Data Quality Act:
Page 43 of the RFC filed by Dr. Wood asserts that the basic integrity
of NCSTAR 1 is lacking because, by its own admission, it did not
investigate the actual destruction of the World Trade Center Towers.
That is, NIST did not accomplish its stated goal of determining "why and
how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed following the initial impacts of the
aircraft and why and how WTC 7 collapsed."
"The focus of the
investigation was on the sequence of events from the instance of
aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower. For
brevity in this report, this sequence is referred to as the 'probable
collapse sequence,' although it does not actually include the structural
behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were
reached and collapse became inevitable."~NCSTAR 1 (http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/)
"STAR WARS in Iraq" movie by Maurizio Torrealta and Sigfrido Ranucci collaboration Giuseppe Mealli images research Giuseppe Soinella with the collaboration of Alessandro Rampiella
Rarely is the truth found in memes, but I hope that these will be shared across the internet so that many can find the truth on their own. ~Ryan G. Banister
[Click on each image to view the image and save: Right Click>> Save As...]
I appeared on Deanna Spingola's program, "Spingola & Friends" on July 30, 2015 to talk about the propaganda front which is often referred to as the "9/11 Truth Movement." We discussed the psy-ops and secrecy which is present in this movement as well as the obfuscations and blatant distortions that have arisen from the demagogues of this movement, namely Jim Fetzer, Richard Gage and others.
I welcome all comments and criticism. Thank you for your interest.
For a forensic study of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, read the book "Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" by Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science and expertise in experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of materials testing.
Buy WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? EVIDENCE OF DIRECTED FREE-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ON 9/11 by Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., PhD. http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/
